Exhaust gas purifying catalyst and production method thereof

ABSTRACT

An exhaust gas purifying catalyst including: a plurality of first compounds  5  which have precious metal particles  3  supported thereon and are formed into a particle shape; and second compounds  7  which are arranged among the plurality of first compounds  5  and separate the first compounds  5  from one another, wherein pore volumes of the precious metal particles  3,  the first compounds  5  and the second compounds  7  are 0.24 to 0.8 cm 3 /g.

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser.No. 12/298,461, filed Oct. 24, 2008, which is the National Stageapplication of International Application No. PCT/JP2007/058076, filedApr. 12, 2007, which claims priority to Japanese Application No.2006-126557, filed Apr. 28, 2006, and Japanese Application No.2007-032269, filed Feb. 13, 2007. All of which are hereby incorporatedby reference in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to an exhaust gas purifying catalyst thatpurifies exhaust gas discharged from a vehicle such as an automobile,and to a production method of the exhaust gas purifying catalyst.

BACKGROUND ART

In recent years, an emission control for an automobile has beentightened up more and more, and an exhaust gas purifying catalyst hasbeen required to purify harmful components contained in exhaust gas, forexample, unburned hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide with highefficiency. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst is one in which preciousmetal particles are supported on a surface of a base material such asalumina. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst oxidizes the harmfulcomponents contained in the exhaust gas by the precious metal particles,and converts the harmful components into water and gas, which areharmless components. Moreover, in general, purification performance ofthe catalyst is enhanced as a surface area of the precious metalparticles is larger, and accordingly, a particle diameter of theprecious metal particles is reduced, whereby the surface area of theprecious metal particles is increased, and surface energy thereof isincreased.

Here, at an initial stage, the precious metal particles of the exhaustgas purifying catalyst are in a state of ultrafine particles with adiameter of several nanometers or less. However, there is a problemthat, as the exhaust gas purifying catalyst is being exposed to ahigh-temperature oxidizing atmosphere, the surface of the precious metalparticles is oxidized, the precious metal particles located in mutualvicinities are coagulated with each other and are coarsened to severalten nanometers, and the surface area of the precious metal particles isdecreased, resulting in a decrease of a purification rate for suchharmful substances. In order to prevent the decrease of the surface areaowing to the coarsening of the precious metal particles, developmentregarding a production method of precious metal particles with a largesurface area, such as a reversed micelle method, has been advanced.

In this reversed micelle method, first, an aqueous solution containing asurfactant and a catalyst active component (for example, a preciousmetal element) is mixed into an organic solvent. Thereafter, an emulsionsolution, in which reversed micelles containing the aqueous solutioncontaining the precious metal are formed, is prepared in the organicsolvent, and the precious metal is deposited therein. Thereafter, theprecious metal is reduced or insolubilized, and the precious metalatomized in the reversed micelle is precipitated. The reversed micellemethod is a method as described above. Moreover, in Japanese PatentLaid-Open Publication No. 2000-42411, a method is disclosed, which isfor producing a catalyst in such a manner that an element having anoxygen occlusion function is contained in the reversed micelles in anemulsion solution preparation step. In this reversed micelle method, thecatalyst active component is supported on the base material in thereversed micelles contained in the emulsion solution, and thereafter,the reversed micelles are collapsed, and an obtained deposit issubjected to the respective steps of filtration, drying, milling andcalcining, whereby the catalyst is produced. The catalyst produced byusing this production method not only can support the element having theoxygen occlusion function on the base material but also supports thecatalyst active component also on an outermost surface of the basematerial and pore surfaces formed in the base material, and accordingly,can enhance activity thereof.

However, in the above-described reversed micelle method, there has beena problem that, since the catalyst is produced by spraying and calciningthe emulsion solution in which the reversed micelles are formed, aproduction process of the catalyst becomes complicated, leading to anincrease of production cost thereof.

In this connection, it is an object of the present invention to providean exhaust gas purifying catalyst in which a production process issimple and a high purification rate can be maintained for a long term,and to provide a production method of the exhaust gas purifyingcatalyst.

-   Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No.    2000-42411

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

An exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to the present inventionincludes: precious metal particles which contact exhaust gas and purifyharmful components; a plurality of first compounds on which the preciousmetal particles are supported; and second compounds which are arrangedamong these first compounds and separate the first compounds from oneanother, wherein pore volumes of these precious metal particles, firstcompounds and second compounds are within a range of 0.24 to 0.8 cm³/g.Moreover, a production method of an exhaust gas purifying catalystaccording to the present invention includes: a supporting step ofsupporting precious metal particles on first compounds; a slurrying stepof slurrying second compounds or a precursor of the second compounds byperforming water dispersion therefor; a dispersion step of dispersingthe first compounds having the precious metal particles supportedthereon into the slurry of the second compounds; and a drying/calciningstep of drying the slurry of the second compounds, into which the firstcompounds are dispersed, followed by calcining, wherein, in thedispersion step, treatment is performed under a condition whereaggregates of the first compounds having the precious metal particlessupported thereon are decomposed.

In accordance with the exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to thepresent invention and with the production method thereof, the secondcompounds are arranged among the plurality of first compounds having theprecious metal particles supported thereon, whereby the first compoundsare separated from one another by interposing the second compoundsthereamong. Accordingly, even after the catalyst is used for a longterm, the precious metal particles are not coagulated with each other,or the first compounds are not coagulated with each other. In such away, a catalyst that maintains a large surface area can be obtained.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic view enlargedly showing an exhaust gas purifyingcatalyst according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic view enlargedly showing an exhaust gas purifyingcatalyst according to a comparative example.

FIGS. 3A to 3C are schematic views showing a production process of theexhaust gas purifying catalyst according to the embodiment of thepresent invention: FIG. 3A shows a precious metal particle; FIG. 3Bshows a state where the precious metal particle is supported on a firstcompound; and FIG. 3C shows a state where the first compounds having theprecious metal particles supported thereon are covered with secondcompounds.

FIG. 4 is a graph for comparing temperatures at which HC(C₃H₆)purification rates of respective catalysts in Examples 1 to 10 andComparative examples 1 and 2 become 50%.

FIG. 5 is a graph for comparing temperatures at which HC(C₃H₆)purification rates of respective catalysts in Examples 11 to 16 andComparative examples 3 to 6 become 50%.

FIG. 6 is a graph for comparing temperatures at which HC(C₃H₆)purification rates of respective catalysts in Examples 17 to 19 andComparative examples 7 and 8 become 50%.

FIG. 7 is a graph for comparing temperatures at which HC(C₃H₆)purification rates of respective catalysts in Examples 20 to 22 andComparative examples 9 and 10 become 50%.

FIG. 8 is a graph for comparing temperatures at which HC(C₃H₆)purification rates of respective catalysts in Examples 23 to 25 andComparative examples 11 and 12 become 50%.

FIG. 9 is a graph for comparing temperatures at which HC(C₃H₆)purification rates of respective catalysts in Examples 26 to 28 andComparative example 13 become 50%.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

A description will be made below of an embodiment of the presentinvention based on the drawings.

[Catalyst]

FIG. 1 is a schematic view enlargedly showing a state of a cross sectionof an exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 1, the exhaust gas purifying catalyst 1 according tothe present invention includes: precious metal particles 3 as activemetal that contacts exhaust gas and purifies harmful components; aplurality of first compounds 5 on which the precious metal particles 3are supported; and second compounds 7 which are arranged among theplurality of first compounds 5 and separate the first compounds 5 fromone another, wherein pore volumes of these precious metal particles 3,first compounds 5 and second compounds 7 are set within a range of 0.24to 0.8 cm³/g. In such a way, movement and coagulation of the preciousmetal particles 3 can be suppressed, and in addition, mutual coagulationof the first compounds 5 can also be suppressed. Hence, a surface areaof a precious metal layer composed of groups of the precious metalparticles 3 can be suitably suppressed from being decreased after thecatalyst 1 is exposed to the exhaust gas.

In the case of suppressing the movement of the precious metal particles3, there is considered: (1) a chemical restraint method (anchoringmethod) of suppressing the movement of the precious metal particles 3 bychemically boding to the precious metal particles 3; or (2) a physicalrestraint method (inclusion method) of suppressing the movement of theprecious metal particles 3 by covering the precious metal particles 3with compounds. In addition to these (1) and (2), and in addition tosuppression of the first compounds 5 themselves supported on theprecious metal particles 3, the present invention further suppressessintering of the precious metal particles 3.

In the case of covering the first compounds 5 having the precious metalparticles 3 supported thereon with the second compounds 7, it isnecessary that the exhaust gas be diffused and reach surfaces of theprecious metal particles 3. For this purpose, gaps with a size of apredetermined range are required for the first compounds 5 and thesecond compounds 7, and these gaps just need to be formed so that thepore volumes of the precious metal particles 3, the first compounds 5and the second compounds 7 can be set within the predetermined range. Itis sufficient if an initial pore volume of the catalyst, that is, a porevolume of the catalyst before the catalyst is exposed to the exhaust gasis within a range of 0.3 to 0.8 cm³/g, and if a pore volume of thecatalyst after the catalyst is exposed to the exhaust gas is within arange of 0.24 to 0.45 cm³/g. Hence, a condition to be defined is to setthe pore volumes of the precious metal particles 3, the first compounds5 and the second compounds 7 within a range of 0.24 to 0.8 cm³/g.

[Precious Metal Particle]

It is preferable that the precious metal particles 3 be composed of atleast any selected from platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd) and rhodium (Rh).It is preferable that a particle diameter of the precious metalparticles 3 be 1 nm to 5 nm.

[First Compound]

It is preferable that the first compounds 5 on which the precious metalparticles 3 are supported be formed into a particle shape. Moreover, itis preferable that the first compounds 5 be an oxide containing Ce.Specifically, a compound containing CeO₂ and a composite oxide of Ce andZr can be used. In the case where the first compounds 5 are the oxidecontaining Ce, the following combinations are preferable for theprecious metal particles 3, the first compounds 5 and the secondcompounds 7.

-   (a-1) Preferable is a combination of Pt particles as the precious    metal particles 3, CeO₂ particles as the first compounds 5, and    Al₂O₃ particles as the second compounds 7, that is, a combination in    which the Al₂O₃ particles are arranged among the CeO₂ particles on    which the Pt particles are supported.-   (a-2) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, CeZrO_(x) particles as the first    compounds 5, and Al₂O₃ particles as the second compounds 7.    Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the Al₂O₃ particles among    the CeZrO_(x) particles on which the Pt particles are supported.-   (a-3) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeO₂ particles as the first    compounds 5, and ZrO₂ particles as the second compounds 7.    Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the ZrO₂ particles among    the CeO₂ particles on which the Pt particles are supported.-   (a-4) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeO₂ particles as the first    compounds 5, and a composite oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ as the second    compounds 7. Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the composite    oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ among the CeO₂ particles on which the Pt    particles are supported.-   (a-5) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeZrO_(x) particles as the first    compounds 5, and the composite oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ as the second    compounds 7. Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the composite    oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ among the CeZrO_(x) particles on which the    Pt particles are supported.

In the case where the first compounds 5 are the oxide containing CeO₂,the following combinations are preferable for the precious metalparticles 3, the first compounds 5 and the second compounds 7.

-   (b-1) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeO₂ particles as the first    compounds 5, and the Al₂O₃ particles as the second compounds 7, that    is, a combination in which the Al₂O₃ particles are arranged among    the CeO₂ particles on which the Pt particles are supported.-   (b-2) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeO₂ particles as the first    compounds 5, and the ZrO₂ particles as the second compounds 7.    Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the ZrO₂ particles among    the CeO₂ particles on which the Pt particles are supported.-   (b-3) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeO₂ particles as the first    compounds 5, and the composite oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ as the second    compounds 7. Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the composite    oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ among the CeO₂ particles on which the Pt    particles are supported.

In the case where the first compounds 5 are a composite oxide containingCe and Zr, the following combinations are preferable for the preciousmetal particles 3, the first compounds 5 and the second compounds 7.

-   (c-1) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeZrO_(x) particles as the first    compounds 5, and the Al₂O₃ particles as the second compounds 7.    Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the Al₂O₃ particles among    the CeZrO_(x) particles on which the Pt particles are supported.-   (c-2) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, the CeZrO_(x) particles as the first    compounds 5, and the composite oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ as the second    compounds 7. Specifically, it is preferable to arrange the composite    oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ among the CeZrO_(x) particles on which the    Pt particles are supported.

In the case where the first compounds 5 are a composite oxide of Mn andAl, the following combinations are preferable for the precious metalparticles 3, the first compounds 5 and the second compounds 7.

-   (c-1) Preferable is a combination of the Pt particles as the    precious metal particles 3, MnAl₂O₄ particles as the first compounds    5, and the Al₂O₃ particles as the second compounds 7. Specifically,    it is preferable to arrange the Al₂O₃ particles among the MnAl₂O₄    particles on which the Pt particles are supported.

[Second Compound]

It is preferable tat the above-described second compounds 7 be an oxidecontaining at least any of Al and Zr. In a combination in the presentinvention, the best combination is a combination in which Pt—CeO₂ iscovered with Al₂O₃, or in which Pt—CeZrO_(x) is covered with Al₂O₃.Moreover, a combination in which Pt—CeO₂ is covered with ZrO₂ is alsogood. Furthermore, a combination in which Pt—CeO₂ or Pt—CeZrO_(x) iscovered with the composite oxide of Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ is also good.Moreover, it is preferable that the above-described second compounds 7be formed into a particle shape, and that an average particle diameterof the above-described second compounds 7 be 10 to 100 nm.

In the catalyst 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention,as shown in FIG. 1, pores 7 are formed by gaps among the particles ofthe second compounds 7, and by gaps among the particles of the firstcompounds 5 and the second compounds 7. Here, in the case where theparticle diameter of the particles of the second compounds 7 is smallerthan 10 nm, then, like a catalyst 11 shown in FIG. 2, the pores 9 formedof the particles of the second compounds 7 become small, and the porevolume becomes small. Therefore, the exhaust gas becomes less likely tobe diffused through the pores 9, and catalyst activity of the catalyst11 is decreased. Meanwhile, in the case where the particle diameter ofthe particles of the second compounds 7 becomes larger than 100 nm, thenthe pores formed thereof become large, and the particles of the firstcompounds 5 on which the precious metal particles are supported come offfrom the gaps among the particles of the second compounds 7, causingsuch an influence that the particles of the first compounds 5 arecoagulated with one another.

[Production Method of Catalyst]

A production method of the catalyst according to this embodimentincludes: a supporting step of supporting the precious metal particles 3on the first compounds 5; a slurrying step of slurrying the secondcompounds 7 or a precursor of the second compounds 7 by performing waterdispersion therefor; a dispersion step of dispersing the first compounds5 having the precious metal particles 3 supported thereon into theslurry of the second compounds 7; and a drying/calcining step of dryingthe slurry of the second compounds, into which the first compounds aredispersed, followed by calcining, wherein, in the dispersion step,treatment is performed under a condition where aggregates of the firstcompounds 5 having the precious metal particles 3 supported thereon aredecomposed.

FIGS. 3A to 3C are schematic views showing a production process of thecatalyst 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention: FIG. 3Ashows the precious metal particle 3; FIG. 3B shows a state where theprecious metal particle 3 is supported on the first compound 5; and FIG.3C shows the catalyst 1 in which the first compounds 5 having theprecious metal particles 3 supported thereon are covered with the secondcompounds 7. For such treatment of decomposing the aggregates of thefirst compounds 5 on which the precious metal particles 3 are supportedand dispersing the first compounds 5 into the second compounds 7, amethod using a dispersant such as polyvinylpyrrolidone, a physicalmethod using shear force brought by high-speed stirring, and the likecan be used.

Examples

Subsequently, a description will be specifically made of the presentinvention through examples.

Example 1

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt% (these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. 118.42 gof needle-like boehmite (ø10 nm×100 nm) in which moisture was containedby 24 wt % was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the ceriaparticles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder a-1 in which the ceria particles A were coatedwith alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-1 and 1.6 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to the ballmill, and the powder a-1 was milled, whereby slurry with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry a-1”) wasformed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles B ofthe second compounds 7, which had rhodium supported thereon by 0.814%,were prepared. 118.42 g of needle-like boehmite in which moisture wascontained by 24 wt % was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was driedand calcined, whereby powder b-1 in which the particles B were coatedwith alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-1 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill,and the powder b-1 was milled, whereby slurry with an average particlediameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry b-1”) was formed. Theslurry a-1 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04L) having a diameter of 036 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-1 was coated by59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcinedat 400° C., whereby a sample of Example 1 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Example 1 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 2

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt% (these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. 113.92 gof plate-like boehmite (20×20×10 nm) in which moisture was contained by21 wt % was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculatedby acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the ceria particles Aprepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder a-2 in which the ceria particles A were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-2 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-2 was milled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameterof 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry a-2”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 113.92 g ofneedle-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 21 wt %) wasput into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-2 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-2 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-2 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-2”) was formed. The slurry a-2 was coated by141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of036 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-2 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 2 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 2 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 3

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt% (these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. 105.88 gof cube-like boehmite with a dimension of 20×20×20 nm (in which moisturewas contained by 15 wt %) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water,and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theceria particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-3 in which the ceria particles Awere coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-3 and1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 gof water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to theball mill, and the powder a-3 was milled, whereby slurry with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry a-3”) wasformed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g ofcube-like boehmite in which moisture was contained by 15 wt % was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-3 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-3 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-3 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-3”) was formed. The slurry a-3 was coated by141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of036 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-3 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 3 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 3 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 4

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt% (these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. 102.27 gof prism-like boehmite (20×20×60 nm) in which moisture was contained by12 wt % was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculatedby acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the ceria particles Aprepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder a-4 in which the ceria particles A were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-4 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-4 was milled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameterof 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry a-4”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 102.27 g ofprism-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 12 wt %) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-4 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-4 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-4 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-4”) was formed. The slurry a-4 was coated by141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter ofø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-4 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 4 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 4 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 5

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt% (these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. 90.9 g ofalumina nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 40 nm (inwhich moisture was contained by 1 wt %) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the ceria particles A prepared in advance was added, and wasdispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thusobtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder a-5 in which the ceriaparticles A were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder a-5 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were added to the ball mill, and the powder a-5 was milled,whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (this isreferred to as “slurry a-5”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 90.9 g ofalumina nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 40 nm (inwhich moisture was contained by 1 wt %) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtainedwas dried and calcined, whereby powder b-5 in which the particles B werecoated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-5 and 3 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder b-5 was milled, whereby slurry with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry b-5”) wasformed. The slurry a-5 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-5was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Example 5 wasobtained. The obtained sample of Example 5 is a catalyst thatindividually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 6

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 20 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt % (these arereferred to as “particles C”) were formed. 118.42 g of needle-likeboehmite (in which moisture was contained by 24 wt %) was put into abeaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultantthus obtained, 90 g of the particles C prepared in advance was added,and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurrythus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder ac-6 in which theparticles C were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder ac-6 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were added to the ball mill, and the powder ac-6 was milled,whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (this isreferred to as “slurry ac-6”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 118.42 g ofneedle-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 24 wt %) wasput into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-1 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-1 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-1 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-1”) was formed. The slurry ac-6 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-1 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 6 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 6 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 7

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 20 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt % (these arereferred to as “particles C”) were formed. 113.92 g of plate-likeboehmite (in which moisture was contained by 21 wt %) was put into abeaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultantthus obtained, 90 g of the particles C prepared in advance was added,and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurrythus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder ac-7 in which theparticles C were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder ac-7 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were added to the ball mill, and the powder ac-7 was milled,whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (this isreferred to as “slurry ac-7”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 113.92 g ofplate-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 21 wt %) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-2 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-2 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-2 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-2”) was formed. The slurry ac-7 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-2 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 7 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 7 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 7

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 20 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85 wt % (these arereferred to as “particles C”) were formed. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (in which moisture was contained by 15 wt %) was put into abeaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultantthus obtained, 90 g of the particles C prepared in advance was added,and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurrythus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder ac-8 in which theparticles C were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder ac-8 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were added to the ball mill, and the powder ac-8 was milled,whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (this isreferred to as “slurry ac-8”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g ofcube-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 15 wt %) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-3 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-3 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-3 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-3”) was formed. The slurry ac-8 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-3 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 8 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 8 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 9

Manganese aluminate particles with an average particle diameter of 40 nmwere used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pd was impregnatedinto the particles, whereby manganese aluminate particles having Pdsupported thereon by 0.85 wt % (these are referred to as “particles D”)were formed. 113.92 g of plate-like boehmite (in which moisture wascontained by 21 wt %) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles D prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder ad-9 in which the particles D were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder ad-9 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder ad-9 was milled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameterof 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry ad-9”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 113.92 g ofplate-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 21 wt %) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-2 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-2 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-2 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-2”) was formed. The slurry ad-9 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-2 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 9 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 9 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pd by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 10

Manganese aluminate particles with an average particle diameter of 40 nmwere used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pd was impregnatedinto the particles, whereby manganese aluminate particles having Pdsupported thereon by 0.85 wt % (these are referred to as “particles D”)were formed. 105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (in which moisture wascontained by 15 wt %) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles D prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder ad-10 in which the particles D were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder ad-10 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder ad-10 was milled, whereby slurry with an average particlediameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry ad-10”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into a zirconium-cerium compositeoxide with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, whereby particles Bhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g ofcube-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 15 wt %) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-3 in which the particles B were coated with alumina was prepared. 172g of this powder b-3 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-3 wasmilled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm (thisis referred to as “slurry b-3”) was formed. The slurry ad-10 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof o36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-3 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 10 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 10 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 11

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. 118.42 g of needle-like boehmite (100nm×010 nm; aspect ratio: 10) (in which moisture was contained by 24%)was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid.To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles A prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powdera-11 in which the particles A were coated with alumina was prepared(only this needle-like boehmite was calcined, and a pore volume thereofwas investigated, then the pore volume was 0.8 cm³/g). 173.4 g of thispowder a-11 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder a-11 was milled, wherebyslurry a-11 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814 were prepared.118.42 g of needle-like boehmite (100 nm×ø10 nm; aspect ratio: 10) (inwhich moisture was contained by 24%) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtainedwas dried and calcined, whereby powder b-11 in which the particles Bwere coated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-11 and 3 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder b-11 was milled, whereby slurry b-11 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-11 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-11 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 11 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 11 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 12

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the ceria-zirconium particles, wherebycerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supported thereonby 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles A”) were formed. 113.92 gof plate-like boehmite (10×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 0.5) (in whichmoisture was contained by 21%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-12 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared (only this plate-like boehmite wascalcined, and a pore volume thereof was investigated, then the porevolume was 0.85 cm³/g). 173.4 g of this powder a-12 and 1.6 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill,and the powder a-12 was milled, whereby slurry a-12 with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.113.92 g of plate-like boehmite (10×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 0.5) (inwhich moisture was contained by 21%) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtainedwas dried and calcined, whereby powder b-12 in which the particles Bwere coated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-12 and 3 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder b-12 was milled, whereby slurry b-12 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-12 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-12 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 12 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 12 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 13

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles A”) were formed.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 1) (in whichmoisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-13 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared (only this cube-like boehmite wascalcined, and a pore volume thereof was investigated, then the porevolume was 0.9 cm³/g). 173.4 g of this powder a-13 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-13 was milled, whereby slurry a-13 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 1) (in whichmoisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtainedwas dried and calcined, whereby powder b-13 in which the particles Bwere coated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-13 and 3 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder b-13 was milled, whereby slurry b-13 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-13 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-13 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 13 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 13 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 14

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles A”) were formed.102.27 g of prism-like boehmite (60×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 3) (in whichmoisture was contained by 12%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-14 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared (only this prism-like boehmite wascalcined, and a pore volume thereof was investigated, then the porevolume was 1.0 cm³/g). 173.4 g of this powder a-14 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-14 was milled, whereby slurry a-14 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.102.27 g of prism-like boehmite (60×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 3) (in whichmoisture was contained by 12%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtainedwas dried and calcined, whereby powder b-14 in which the particles Bwere coated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-14 and 3 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder b-14 was milled, whereby slurry b-14 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-14 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry b-14 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Example 14 was obtained. The obtained sample ofExample 14 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 15

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 20 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pdwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pd supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles C”) were formed.113.92 g of plate-like boehmite (10×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 0.5) (inwhich moisture was contained by 21%) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and made acidic. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles C prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder ad-15 in which the particles C were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder ad-15 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder ad-15 was milled, whereby slurry ad-15 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.113.92 g of plate-like boehmite (10×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 0.5) (inwhich moisture was contained by 21%) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and made acidic. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was driedand calcined, whereby powder b-12 in which the particles B were coatedwith alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-12 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder b-12 was milled, whereby slurry b-12 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry ad-15 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry b-12 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Example 15 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 15 isa catalyst that individually carries thereon Pd by 0.593 g/L and Rh by0.236 g/L.

Example 16

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 20 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pdwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pd supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles C”) were formed. 105.88 g of cube-like boehmite(20×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 1) (in which moisture was contained by 15%)was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and made acidic. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles C prepared in advance wasadded, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter,slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder ad-16 inwhich the particles C were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g ofthis powder ad-16 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acidsolution were added to the ball mill, and the powder ad-16 was milled,whereby slurry ad-16 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm wasformed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 1) (in whichmoisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtainedwas dried and calcined, whereby powder b-13 in which the particles Bwere coated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder b-13 and 3 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder b-13 was milled, whereby slurry b-13 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry ad-16 wascoated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having adiameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils,followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-13 was coated by 59 g/Lthereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at400° C., whereby a sample of Example 16 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Example 16 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Pdby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 17

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with a pore volume of 0.18cm³/g were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt wasimpregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxideparticles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles D1”) were formed. 105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thusobtained, 90 g of the particles D1 prepared in advance was added, andwas dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thusobtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder a-17 in which theparticles D1 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder a-17 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder a-17 was milled, wherebyslurry a-17 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with a pore volume of 0.28 cm³/g, whereby particles Elhaving rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g ofcube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated byacid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles E1 prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-17 in which the particles E1 were coated with aluminawas prepared. 172 g of this powder b-17 and 3 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and the powderb-17 was milled, whereby slurry b-17 with an average particle diameterof 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-17 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycombcarrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cellswith a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, theslurry b-17 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying.Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample ofExample 17 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 17 is a catalystthat individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 18

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with a pore volume of 0.28cm³/g were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt wasimpregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxideparticles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles D2”) were formed. 105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thusobtained, 90 g of the particles D2 prepared in advance was added, andwas dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thusobtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder a-18 in which theparticles D2 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder a-18 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder a-18 was milled, wherebyslurry a-18 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with a pore volume of 0.30 cm³/g, whereby particles E2having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g ofcube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated byacid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles E2 prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-18 in which the particles E2 were coated with aluminawas prepared. 172 g of this powder b-18 and 3 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and the powderb-18 was milled, whereby slurry b-18 with an average particle diameterof 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-18 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycombcarrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cellswith a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, theslurry b-18 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying.Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample ofExample 18 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 18 is a catalystthat individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 19

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with a pore volume of 0.30cm³/g were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt wasimpregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxideparticles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles D3”) were formed. 105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thusobtained, 90 g of the particles D3 prepared in advance was added, andwas dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thusobtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder a-19 in which theparticles D3 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of thispowder a-19 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder a-19 was milled, wherebyslurry a-19 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with a pore volume of 0.32 cm³/g, whereby particles E3having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g ofcube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated byacid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles E3 prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-19 in which the particles E3 were coated with aluminawas prepared. 172 g of this powder b-19 and 3 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and the powderb-19 was milled, whereby slurry b-19 with an average particle diameterof 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-19 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycombcarrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cellswith a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, theslurry b-19 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying.Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample ofExample 19 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 19 is a catalystthat individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 20

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles in which cerium occupied 74%and zirconium occupied 26% in terms of composition were used as thefirst compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles F1”) were formed.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture wascontained by 15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles F1 prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder a-20 in which the particles F1 were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-20 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-20 was milled, whereby slurry a-20 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles in which zirconium occupied 95% and lanthanum occupied5% in terms of composition, whereby particles G1 having rhodiumsupported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles G1 prepared in advancewas added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-20 in which the particles G1 were coated with alumina was prepared.172 g of this powder b-20 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to aball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-20 wasmilled, whereby slurry b-20 with an average particle diameter of 3 μmwas formed. The slurry a-20 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-20was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Example 20 wasobtained. The obtained sample of Example 20 is a catalyst thatindividually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 21

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles in which cerium occupied 78%and zirconium occupied 22% in terms of composition were used as thefirst compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles F2”) were formed.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture wascontained by 15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles F2 prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder a-21 in which the particles F2 were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-21 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-21 was milled, whereby slurry a-21 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles in which zirconium occupied 97% and lanthanum occupied3% in terms of composition, whereby particles G2 having rhodiumsupported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles G2 prepared in advancewas added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-21 in which the particles G2 were coated with alumina was prepared.172 g of this powder b-21 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to aball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-21 wasmilled, whereby slurry b-21 with an average particle diameter of 3 μmwas formed. The slurry a-21 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-21was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Example 21 wasobtained. The obtained sample of Example 21 is a catalyst thatindividually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 22

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles in which cerium occupied 80%and zirconium occupied 20% in terms of composition were used as thefirst compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles F3”) were formed.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture wascontained by 15%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, anddeflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles F3 prepared in advance was added, and was dispersed thereintoby high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried andcalcined, whereby powder a-22 in which the particles F3 were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-22 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder a-22 was milled, whereby slurry a-22 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles in which zirconium occupied 99% and lanthanum occupied1% in terms of composition, whereby particles G3 having rhodiumsupported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles G3 prepared in advancewas added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderb-22 in which the particles G3 were coated with alumina was prepared.172 g of this powder b-22 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to aball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-22 wasmilled, whereby slurry b-22 with an average particle diameter of 3 μmwas formed. The slurry a-22 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-22was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Example 22 wasobtained. The obtained sample of Example 22 is a catalyst thatindividually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 23

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. 105.04 g of needle-like boehmite (ø10nm×100 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 24.6%) was put into abeaker into which water was poured, cerium nitrate was added thereto sothat an amount thereof as cerium oxide could be 4.5 g, and zirconylnitrate was dispersed into the water so that an amount thereof aszirconium oxide could be 6.3 g. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-23 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-23 and 1.6 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ballmill, and the powder a-23 was milled, whereby slurry a-23 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.118.42 g of needle-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by24%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated byacid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-11 in which the particles B were coated with aluminawas prepared. 172 g of this powder b-11 and 3 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and the powderb-11 was milled, whereby slurry b-11 with an average particle diameterof 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-23 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycombcarrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cellswith a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, theslurry b-11 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying.Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample ofExample 23 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 23 is a catalystthat individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 24

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. 101.46 g of needle-like boehmite (ø10nm×100 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 24.6%) was put into abeaker into which water was poured, cerium nitrate was added thereto sothat an amount thereof as cerium oxide could be 9 g, and zirconylnitrate was dispersed into the water so that an amount thereof aszirconium oxide could be 4.5 g. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-24 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-24 and 1.6 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ballmill, and the powder a-24 was milled, whereby slurry a-24 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.118.42 g of needle-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by24%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated byacid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-11 in which the particles B were coated with aluminawas prepared. 172 g of this powder b-11 and 3 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and the powderb-11 was milled, whereby slurry b-11 with an average particle diameterof 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-24 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycombcarrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cellswith a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, theslurry b-11 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying.Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample ofExample 24 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 24 is a catalystthat individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 25

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. 97.88 g of needle-like boehmite (ø10nm×100 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 24.6%) was put into abeaker into which water was poured, cerium nitrate was added thereto sothat an amount thereof as cerium oxide could be 13.5 g, and zirconylnitrate was dispersed into the water so that an amount thereof aszirconium oxide could be 2.7 g. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder a-25 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder a-25 and 1.6 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ballmill, and the powder a-25 was milled, whereby slurry a-25 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.118.42 g of needle-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by24%) was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated byacid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles B prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-11 in which the particles B were coated with aluminawas prepared. 172 g of this powder b-11 and 3 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and the powderb-11 was milled, whereby slurry b-11 with an average particle diameterof 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-25 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycombcarrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cellswith a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, theslurry b-11 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying.Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample ofExample 25 was obtained. The obtained sample of Example 25 is a catalystthat individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 26

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles, anda resultant was calcined at 700° C. for two hours, wherebycerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supported thereonby 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles I1”) were formed. A degreeof dispersion of Pt in the particles I1 was 50%. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles I1 prepared in advancewas added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powdera-26 in which the particles I1 were coated with alumina was prepared. Adegree of dispersion of Pt in the particles was 35%. 173.4 g of thispowder a-26 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder a-26 was milled, wherebyslurry a-26 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, and aresultant was calcined at 400° C. for one hour, wherebyzirconium-lanthanum composite oxide particles having rhodium supportedthereon by 0.814% (these are referred to as “particles J1”) wereprepared. A degree of dispersion of Rh in the particles J1 was 56%.105.88 g of cube-like boehmite (in which moisture was contained by 15%)was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid.To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles J1 prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by the high-speedstirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined,whereby powder b-26 in which the particles J1 were coated with aluminawas prepared. A degree of dispersion of Rh in the powder was 38%. 172 gof this powder b-26 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acidsolution were further added to the ball mill, and the powder b-26 wasmilled, whereby slurry b-26 with an average particle diameter of 3 μmwas formed. The slurry a-26 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-26was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Example 26 wasobtained. The obtained sample of Example 26 is a catalyst thatindividually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 27

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles, anda resultant was calcined at 600° C. for two hours, wherebycerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supported thereonby 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles I2”) were formed. A degreeof dispersion of Pt in the particles I2 was 50%. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles 12 prepared in advancewas added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powdera-27 in which the particles 12 were coated with alumina was prepared. Adegree of dispersion of Pt in the particles a-27 was 50%. 173.4 g ofthis powder a-27 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ballmill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acidsolution were added to the ball mill, and the powder a-27 was milled,whereby slurry a-27 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm wasformed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, and aresultant was calcined at 400° C. for one hour, whereby the particles J1having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. A degree ofdispersion of Rh in the particles J1 was 56%. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thusobtained, 90 g of the particles J1 prepared in advance was added, andwas dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurrythus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder b-27 in which theparticles J1 were coated with alumina was prepared. A degree ofdispersion of Rh in the powder b-27 was 38%. 172 g of this powder b-27and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further addedto the ball mill, and the powder b-27 was milled, whereby slurry b-27with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-27was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having adiameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils,followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-27 was coated by 59 g/Lthereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at400° C., whereby a sample of Example 27 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Example 27 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Example 28

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles, anda resultant was calcined at 400° C. for one hour, wherebycerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supported thereonby 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles I3”) were formed. A degreeof dispersion of Pt in the particles I3 was 100%. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (20×20×20 nm) (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was putinto a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To aresultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles I3 prepared in advancewas added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powdera-28 in which the particles I3 were coated with alumina was prepared. Adegree of dispersion of Pt in the powder was 80%. 173.4 g of this powdera-28 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder a-28 was milled, wherebyslurry a-28 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, and aresultant was calcined at 400° C. for one hour, whereby the particles J1having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. A degree ofdispersion of Rh in the particles J1 was 56%. 105.88 g of cube-likeboehmite (in which moisture was contained by 15%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thusobtained, 90 g of the particles J1 prepared in advance was added, andwas dispersed thereinto by the high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurrythus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powder b-28 in which theparticles J1 were coated with alumina was prepared. A degree ofdispersion of Rh in the powder b-28 was 38%. 172 g of this powder b-28and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further addedto the ball mill, and the powder b-28 was milled, whereby slurry b-28with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry a-28was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having adiameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils,followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry b-28 was coated by 59 g/Lthereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at400° C., whereby a sample of Example 28 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Example 28 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 1

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85%(these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. Aluminumisopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of the ceriaparticles A was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder c-1 in which the particles A were coated withalumina was prepared. An average particle diameter of the alumina was 7to 8 nm. 173.4 g of this powder c-1 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and the powder c-1was milled, whereby slurry with an average particle diameter of 3 μm(this is referred to as “slurry c-1”) was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-cerium compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.562.5 g of zirconia sol with an average particle diameter of 8 nm (inwhich moisture was contained by 84%) was put into a beaker, and 90 g ofthe particles B prepared in advance was added thereto, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder cb-1 in which the particles B werecoated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-1 and 3 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder cb-1 was milled, whereby slurry with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry cb-1”)was formed. The slurry c-1 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry cb-1was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Comparativeexample 1 was obtained. The obtained sample of Comparative example 1 isa catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by0.236 g/L.

Comparative example 2

CeO₂ particles with an average particle diameter of 30 nm were used asthe first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnated into the CeO₂particles, whereby CeO₂ particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85%(these are referred to as “ceria particles A”) were formed. 90.9 g ofalumina nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 110 nm (inwhich moisture was contained by 1 wt %) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and made acidic. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of theceria particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder c-2 in which the ceria particles Awere coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-2 and1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 gof water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to theball mill, and the powder c-2 was milled, whereby slurry with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry c-2”) wasformed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-cerium compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.90.9 g of alumina nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 110nm (in which moisture was contained by 1%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and made acidic. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder cb-2 in which the particles B werecoated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-2 and 3 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were further added to theball mill, and the powder cb-2 was milled, whereby slurry with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm (this is referred to as “slurry cb-2”)was formed. The slurry c-2 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier(capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wallthickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry cb-2was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, aresultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby a sample of Comparativeexample 2 was obtained. The obtained sample of Comparative example 2 isa catalyst that individually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 3

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles A”) were formed.Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles A was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder c-3 in which the particles A were coated withalumina was prepared. An average particle diameter of the alumina was 7to 8 nm. 173.4 g of this powder c-3 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina wereadded to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10%nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and the powder c-3 wasmilled, whereby slurry c-3 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm wasformed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles B was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder cb-3 in which the particles B were coated withalumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-3 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder cb-3 was milled, whereby slurry cb-3 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-3 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-3 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 3 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 3 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 4

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles,whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supportedthereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles A”) were formed.90.9 g of alumina nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 130nm (in which moisture was contained by 1 wt %) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and made acidic. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder c-4 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-4 and 1.6 gof boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g ofwater and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to theball mill, and the powder c-4 was milled, whereby slurry c-4 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.90.9 g of alumina nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 130nm (in which moisture was contained by 1%) was put into a beaker,dispersed into water, and made acidic. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder cb-4 in which the particles B werecoated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-4 and 3 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ballmill, and the powder cb-4 was milled, whereby slurry cb-4 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-4 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry cb-4 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Comparative example 4 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Comparative example 4 is a catalyst that individually carriesthereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 5

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. 120 g of needle-like boehmite (150nm×010 nm; aspect ratio: 15) (in which moisture was contained by 25%)was put into a beaker, dispersed into water, and deflocculated by acid.To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles A prepared inadvance was added, and was dispersed thereinto by high-speed stirring.Thereafter, slurry thus obtained was dried and calcined, whereby powderc-5 in which the particles A were coated with alumina was prepared (onlythis needle-like boehmite was calcined, and a pore volume thereof wasinvestigated, then the pore volume was 0.7 cm³/g). 173.4 g of thispowder c-5 and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill.Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solutionwere added to the ball mill, and the powder c-5 was milled, wherebyslurry c-5 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.120 g of needle-like boehmite (150 nm×ø10 nm; aspect ratio: 15) (inwhich moisture was contained by 25%) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder cb-5 in which the particles B werecoated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-5 and 3 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ballmill, and the powder cb-5 was milled, whereby slurry cb-5 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-5 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry cb-5 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Comparative example 5 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Comparative example 5 is a catalyst that individually carriesthereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 6

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the cerium-zirconium particles, wherebycerium-zirconium composite oxide particles having Pt supported thereonby 0.85% (these are referred to as “particles A”) were formed. 113.92 gof plate-like boehmite (5×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 0.25) (in whichmoisture was contained by 21%) was put into a beaker, dispersed intowater, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g ofthe particles A prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder c-6 in which the particles A werecoated with alumina was prepared (only this plate-like boehmite wascalcined, and a pore volume thereof was investigated, then the porevolume was 0.85 cm³/g). 173.4 g of this powder c-6 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder c-6 was milled, whereby slurry c-6 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.113.92 g of plate-like boehmite (5×20×20 nm; aspect ratio: 0.25) (inwhich moisture was contained by 21%) was put into a beaker, dispersedinto water, and deflocculated by acid. To a resultant thus obtained, 90g of the particles B prepared in advance was added, and was dispersedthereinto by high-speed stirring. Thereafter, slurry thus obtained wasdried and calcined, whereby powder cb-6 in which the particles B werecoated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-6 and 3 g ofboehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of waterand 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ballmill, and the powder cb-6 was milled, whereby slurry cb-6 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-6 was coatedby 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameterof ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed bydrying, and thereafter, the slurry cb-6 was coated by 59 g/L thereon,followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C.,whereby a sample of Comparative example 6 was obtained. The obtainedsample of Comparative example 6 is a catalyst that individually carriesthereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 7

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with a pore volume of 0.15cm³/g were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt wasimpregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxideparticles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles D4”) were formed. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g ofAl₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thusobtained, 90 g of the particles D4 was added, and water was furtheradded thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water andorganic matter such as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated anddried, followed by calcining, whereby powder c-7 in which the particlesD4 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-7 and1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 gof water and 17.5 g of a 10 wt % nitric acid solution were added to theball mill, and the powder c-7 was milled, whereby slurry c-7 with anaverage particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with a pore volume of 0.16 cm³/g, whereby particles E4having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. Aluminumisopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles E4 was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder cb-7 in which the particles E4 were coatedwith alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-7 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder cb-7 was milled, whereby slurry cb-7 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-7 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-7 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 7 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 7 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 8

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with a pore volume of 0.4cm³/g were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt wasimpregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxideparticles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles D5”) were formed. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g ofAl₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thusobtained, 90 g of the particles D5 was added, and water was furtheradded thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water andorganic matter such as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated anddried, followed by calcining, whereby powder c-8 in which the particlesD5 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-8 and1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 gof water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ballmill, and the powder c-8 was milled, whereby slurry c-8 with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with a pore volume of 0.41 cm³/g, whereby particles E5having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. Aluminumisopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles E5 was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder cb-8 in which the particles E5 were coatedwith alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-8 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder cb-8 was milled, whereby slurry cb-8 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-8 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-8 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 8 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 8 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 9

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles in which cerium oxideoccupied 70% and zirconium oxide occupied 30% in terms of compositionwere used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnatedinto the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particleshaving Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles F4”) were formed. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g ofAl₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thusobtained, 90 g of the particles F4 was added, and water was furtheradded thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water andorganic matter such as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated anddried, followed by calcining, whereby powder c-9 in which the particlesF4 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-9 and1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 gof water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ballmill, and the powder c-9 was milled, whereby slurry c-9 with an averageparticle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles in which zirconium occupied 90% and lanthanum occupied10%, whereby particles G4 having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814%were prepared. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ wasdissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90g of the particles G4 was added, and water was further added thereto,whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic mattersuch as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followedby calcining, whereby powder cb-9 in which the particles G4 were coatedwith alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-9 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder cb-9 was milled, whereby slurry cb-9 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-9 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-9 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 9 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 9 is a catalyst that individually carries thereon Ptby 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 10

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles in which cerium oxideoccupied 90% and zirconium oxide occupied 10% in terms of compositionwere used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Pt was impregnatedinto the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particleshaving Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles F5”) were formed. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g ofAl₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thusobtained, 90 g of the particles F5 was added, and water was furtheradded thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water andorganic matter such as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated anddried, followed by calcining, whereby powder c-10 in which the particlesF5 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-10and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter,307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added tothe ball mill, and the powder c-10 was milled, whereby slurry c-10 withan average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconia particles in whichzirconia occupied 100%, whereby particles G5 having rhodium supportedthereon by 0.814% were prepared. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solutionthus obtained, 90 g of the particles G5 was added, and water was furtheradded thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water andorganic matter such as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated anddried, followed by calcining, whereby powder cb-10 in which theparticles G5 were coated with alumina was prepared. 172 g of this powdercb-10 and 3 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter,307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were furtheradded to the ball mill, and the powder cb-10 was milled, whereby slurrycb-10 with an average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurryc-10 was coated by 141 g/L on a honeycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L)having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400 cells with a wall thickness of 6mils, followed by drying, and thereafter, the slurry cb-10 was coated by59 g/L thereon, followed by drying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcinedat 400° C., whereby a sample of Comparative example 10 was obtained. Theobtained sample of Comparative example 10 is a catalyst thatindividually carries thereon Pt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 11

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to87.3 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To asolution thus obtained, cerium acetylacetonate was added so that anamount thereof as cerium oxide could be 1.8 g, and moreover, zirconiumacetylacetonate was added so that an amount thereof as zirconium oxidecould be 0.9 g. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles Awas added, and water was further added thereto, whereby hydrolysis wasperformed therefor. The water and organic matter such as the2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder c-11 in which the particles A were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-11 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder c-11 was milled, whereby slurry c-11 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles B was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder cb-3 in which the particles B were coated withalumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-3 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder cb-3 was milled, whereby slurry cb-3 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-11 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-3 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 11 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 11 is a catalyst that individually carries thereonPt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 12

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, whereby cerium-zirconium compositeoxide particles having Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referredto as “particles A”) were formed. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 63g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solutionthus obtained, cerium acetylacetonate was added so that an amountthereof as cerium oxide could be 18.0 g, and moreover, zirconiumacetylacetonate was added so that an amount thereof as zirconium oxidecould be 9.0 g. To a resultant thus obtained, 90 g of the particles Awas added, and water was further added thereto, whereby hydrolysis wasperformed therefor. The water and organic matter such as the2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder c-12 in which the particles A were coated withalumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-12 and 1.6 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added to the ball mill, and thepowder c-12 was milled, whereby slurry c-12 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, wherebyparticles B having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared.Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of theparticles B was added, and water was further added thereto, wherebyhydrolysis was performed therefor. The water and organic matter such asthe 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder cb-3 in which the particles B were coated withalumina was prepared. 172 g of this powder cb-3 and 3 g of boehmitealumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5g of a 10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, andthe powder cb-3 was milled, whereby slurry cb-3 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-12 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-3 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 12 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 12 is a catalyst that individually carries thereonPt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

Comparative Example 13

Cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles with an average particlediameter of 30 nm were used as the first compounds 5. Dinitrodiamine Ptwas impregnated into the particles, and a resultant was calcined at 800°C. for two hours, whereby cerium-zirconium composite oxide particleshaving Pt supported thereon by 0.85% (these are referred to as“particles I4”) were formed. A degree of dispersion of Pt in theparticles I4 was 40%. Aluminum isopropoxide equivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol. To a solution thusobtained, 90 g of the particles I4 was added, and water was furtheradded thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performed therefor. The water andorganic matter such as the 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated anddried, followed by calcining, whereby powder c-13 in which the particlesI4 were coated with alumina was prepared. 173.4 g of this powder c-13and 1.6 g of boehmite alumina were added to a ball mill. Thereafter,307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a 10% nitric acid solution were added tothe ball mill, and the powder c-13 was milled, whereby slurry c-13 withan average particle diameter of 3 μm was formed.

Next, rhodium nitrate was impregnated into zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles with an average particle diameter of 20 nm, and aresultant was calcined at 700° C. for two hours, whereby particles J4having rhodium supported thereon by 0.814% were prepared. A degree ofdispersion of Rh in the particles J4 was 45%. Aluminum isopropoxideequivalent to 90 g of Al₂O₃ was dissolved into 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol.To a solution thus obtained, 90 g of the particles J4 was added, andwater was further added thereto, whereby hydrolysis was performedtherefor. The water and organic matter such as the2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol were evaporated and dried, followed bycalcining, whereby powder cb-13 in which the particles J4 were coatedwith alumina was prepared. A degree of dispersion of Rh in the powdercb-13 was 30%. 172 g of this powder cb-13 and 3 g of boehmite aluminawere added to a ball mill. Thereafter, 307.5 g of water and 17.5 g of a10% nitric acid solution were further added to the ball mill, and thepowder cb-13 was milled, whereby slurry cb-13 with an average particlediameter of 3 μm was formed. The slurry c-13 was coated by 141 g/L on ahoneycomb carrier (capacity: 0.04 L) having a diameter of ø36 mm and 400cells with a wall thickness of 6 mils, followed by drying, andthereafter, the slurry cb-13 was coated by 59 g/L thereon, followed bydrying. Thereafter, a resultant was calcined at 400° C., whereby asample of Comparative example 13 was obtained. The obtained sample ofComparative example 13 is a catalyst that individually carries thereonPt by 0.593 g/L and Rh by 0.236 g/L.

[Evaluation]

The catalysts prepared according to Examples 1 to 28 and Comparativeexamples 1, 2 and 3 to 13 were used, and five pieces of each weremounted per bank in exhaust portions of a V-engine with a displacementof 3500 cc. A durability test was performed in such a manner thatJapanese-domestic regular gasoline was used, a catalyst inlettemperature was set at 650° C., and the engine was operated for 30hours. Then, a thermal history was inspected. Moreover, each of thecatalysts after the durability test was built in a simulation exhaustgas flowing device, simulation exhaust gas with a composition shown inTable 1 was flown through the simulation exhaust gas flowing device, andtemperatures at which purification rates for NOx, CO and HC(C₃H₆) became50% (T50 temperature) were investigated while raising a catalysttemperature at a rate of 30° C./min. Furthermore, a first layer andsecond layer of each of the catalysts after the durability test werescraped off, and pore volumes of such catalyst layers, which weremeasured by a gas adsorption method, were inspected.

TABLE 1 REACTION GAS COMPOSITION NO 1000 ppm O₂ 0.60% H₂ 0.20% HC(C₃H₆)  1665 ppmC CO 0.60% CO₂ 15.50%  H₂O  10% N₂ RESIDUE SPACE VELOCITY: SV= 60000/h

Table 2 shows evaluation results and the pore volumes of the catalystlayers in the respective catalysts of Example 1 to Example 10 andComparative example 1 and Comparative example 2. Moreover, FIG. 4 showsHC T50 temperatures, at which HC(C₃H₆) purification rates became 50%,for Example 1 to Example 10 and Comparative example 1 and Comparativeexample 2.

TABLE 2 FIRST LAYER SECOND LAYER PRE- PORE PRE- CIOUS FIRST SECONDVOLUME CIOUS FIRST METAL COMPOUND COMPOUND (cm³/g) METAL COMPOUNDEXAMPLE 1 Pt CeO₂ Al₂O₃ 0.25 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE OXIDE EXAMPLE 2 Pt CeO₂Al₂O₃ 0.31 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE OXIDE EXAMPLE 3 Pt CeO₂ Al₂O₃ 0.33 Rh ZrCeCOMPOSITE OXIDE EXAMPLE 4 Pt CeO₂ Al₂O₃ 0.35 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE OXIDEEXAMPLE 5 Pt CeO₂ Al₂O₃ 0.60 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE OXIDE EXAMPLE 6 Pt CeZrAl₂O₃ 0.24 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE EXAMPLE 7 Pt CeZrAl₂O₃ 0.30 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE EXAMPLE 8 Pt CeZrAl₂O₃ 0.32 Rh ZrCe COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE EXAMPLE 9 PdMANGANESE Al₂O₃ 0.32 Rh ZrCe ALUMINATE COMPOSITE OXIDE EXAMPLE 10 PdMANGANESE Al₂O₃ 0.35 Rh ZrCe ALUMINATE COMPOSITE OXIDE COMPARATIVE PtCeO₂ Al₂O₃ 0.22 Rh ZrCe EXAMPLE 1 COMPOSITE OXIDE COMPARATIVE Pt CeO₂Al₂O₃ 0.65 Rh ZrCe EXAMPLE 2 COMPOSITE OXIDE SECOND LAYER NOx50% HC 50%CO 50% PORE PURIFICATION PURIFICATION PURIFICATION SECOND VOLUMETEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE COMPOUND (cm³/g) (° C.) (° C.) (°C.) EXAMPLE 1 Al₂O₃ 0.24 286 284 268 EXAMPLE 2 Al₂O₃ 0.30 284 282 266EXAMPLE 3 Al₂O₃ 0.32 282 280 264 EXAMPLE 4 Al₂O₃ 0.34 280 278 262EXAMPLE 5 Al₂O₃ 0.57 278 276 260 EXAMPLE 6 Al₂O₃ 0.24 285 283 266EXAMPLE 7 Al₂O₃ 0.30 283 281 264 EXAMPLE 8 Al₂O₃ 0.32 281 279 262EXAMPLE 9 Al₂O₃ 0.30 277 275 260 EXAMPLE 10 Al₂O₃ 0.32 275 273 258COMPARATIVE ZrO₂ 0.19 299 297 293 EXAMPLE 1 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.63 305303 300 EXAMPLE 2

Comparative example 1 is the catalyst, in which alumina from aluminumisopropoxide is used for the first layer, and zirconia was used for thesecond layer. In both of the layers, the pore volumes were the smallestamong the examples. When the Pt particles after the durability test wereobserved by a TEM, a particle diameter of the Pt particles wasapproximately 10 nm, coagulation of the Pt particles was small, andcoagulation of the Rh particles was also small. However, catalystactivity was low. This is considered to be because, though the particlediameter of the Pt particles is small, the pore volumes are small, theexhaust gas is difficult to pass through the pores, and the exhaust gasis less likely to reach the Pt particles.

In Comparative example 2, alumina particles with a particle diameter aslarge as 110 nm are used for the first layer. Therefore, the pore volumealso becomes large. When the Pt particles were observed by the TEM forthe catalyst after the durability test, a particle diameter of the Ptparticles became as large as approximately 20 nm or more, thecoagulation of the Pt particles was confirmed, and the coagulation ofthe CeO2 particles was also observed. This is considered to be because,since the alumina particles are large, gaps among the alumina particlesare large, the Pt-attached ceria particles moved from the gaps duringthe durability test, and the coagulation among the ceria particlesoccurred. It is also considered that the Pt particles were coagulatedfollowing the coagulation of the ceria particles, leading to an increaseof the diameter of the Pt particles concerned. In a similar way, anincrease of the particle diameter of the. Rh particles in the secondlayer was observed to 15 nm. It is considered that the catalyst activitytherefore became low though the pore volumes were large.

As opposed to this, in each of the catalysts in Example 1 to Example 8,the particle diameter of the Pt particles after the durability test wasapproximately 10 nm, and the coagulation of the Pt particles was small.Moreover, the particle diameter of the Rh particles was approximately 6nm, and the coagulation thereof was small. Furthermore, in each ofExample 9 and Example 10, the diameter of the Pd particles was as smallas 7 nm to 8 nm, and the coagulation of the Pd particles was small. Alsowith regard to the Rh particles, the diameter thereof was approximately6 nm, and the coagulation thereof was small. The catalyst activity ofeach of these Examples 1 to 10 was extremely good in comparison withthose of Comparative examples 1 and 2, and high activity was able to beobtained.

Table 3 shows evaluation results and the pore volumes of the catalystlayers in the respective catalysts of Example 11 to Example 16 andComparative example 3 to Comparative example 6. Moreover, FIG. 5 showsHC T50 temperatures, at which the HC(C₃H₆) purification rates became50%, for Example 11 to Example 16 and Comparative example 3 toComparative example 6.

TABLE 3 FIRST LAYER SECOND LAYER PRE- PORE PRE- CIOUS FIRST SECONDVOLUME CIOUS FIRST METAL COMPOUND COMPOUND (cm³/g) METAL COMPOUNDEXAMPLE 11 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.24 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 12 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.34 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 13 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 14 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.80 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 15 Pd CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.33 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 16 Pd CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.47 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDECOMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.21 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 3 COMPOSITE COMPOSITEOXIDE OXIDE COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.83 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 4 COMPOSITECOMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.82 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 5COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.22 Rh ZrLaEXAMPLE 6 COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE SECOND LAYER NOx50% HC 50% CO50% PORE PURIFICATION PURIFICATION PURIFICATION SECOND VOLUMETEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE COMPOUND (cm³/g) (° C.) (° C.) (°C.) EXAMPLE 11 Al₂O₃ 0.25 323 317 315 EXAMPLE 12 Al₂O₃ 0.33 321 316 314EXAMPLE 13 Al₂O₃ 0.51 320 314 312 EXAMPLE 14 Al₂O₃ 0.78 317 310 308EXAMPLE 15 Al₂O₃ 0.32 319 313 310 EXAMPLE 16 Al₂O₃ 0.49 318 314 311COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 329 325 321 EXAMPLE 3 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.82 328326 322 EXAMPLE 4 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.81 328 325 321 EXAMPLE 5COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 329 326 322 EXAMPLE 6

Comparative example 3 is the catalyst, in which alumina from aluminumisopropoxide is used for the first layer, and zirconia was used for thesecond layer. In both of the layers, the pore volumes were the smallestamong the examples. When the Pt particles after the durability wereobserved by the TEM, a particle diameter of the Pt particles wasapproximately 10 nm, and the coagulation of the Pt particles was small.Moreover, the coagulation of Rh was also small. However, catalystactivity was low. This is considered to be because, though the diameterof the Pt particles is small, the pore volumes are small, the exhaustgas is difficult to pass through the pores, and the exhaust gas is lesslikely to reach the Pt particles.

In Comparative example 4, alumina particles with a particle diameter aslarge as 130 nm are used for the first layer. Therefore, the pore volumealso takes a large value. When the Pt particles were observed by the TEMfor the catalyst after the durability, a diameter of the Pt particlesbecame as large as approximately 20 nm or more, the coagulation of thePt particles was confirmed, and the coagulation of the cerium-zirconiumcomposite oxide particles was also observed. This is considered to bebecause, since the alumina particles are large, gaps among the aluminaparticles are large, the Pt-attached cerium-zirconium composite oxideparticles moved from the gaps during the durability, and the coagulationamong the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles occurred. It isalso considered that Pt was coagulated following the coagulation of thecerium-zirconium composite oxide particles, leading to an increase ofthe diameter of the Pt particles concerned. In a similar way, anincrease of the particle diameter of the Rh particles in the secondlayer was observed to 15 nm. It is considered that the catalyst activitytherefore became low though the pore volumes were large.

Comparative example 5 is one using, for the source of the alumina, theboehmite in which the aspect ratio is as large as 15, in which the porevolumes are large. When the Pt particles after the durability wereobserved by the TEM, a diameter of the Pt particles became as large as20 nm or more, the coagulation of the Pt particles was confirmed, andthe coagulation of the cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles wasalso observed. This is considered to be because, since the aluminaparticles are long, gaps among the alumina particles become large, thePt-attached cerium-zirconium composite oxide particles moved from thegaps during the durability, and the coagulation among thecerium-zirconium composite oxide particles occurred. It is alsoconsidered that Pt was coagulated following the coagulation of thecerium-zirconium composite oxide particles, leading to an increase ofthe diameter of the Pt particles concerned. In a similar way, anincrease of the particle diameter of the Rh particles in the secondlayer was observed to 15 nm. It is considered that the catalyst activitytherefore became low though the pore volumes were large.

Comparative example 6 is one using, for the source of the alumina, theboehmite in which the aspect ratio is as small as 0.25, in which thepore volumes are small in both of the first layer and the second layer.When the Pt particles after the durability were observed by the TEM, adiameter of the Pt particles was approximately 10 nm, and thecoagulation of the Pt particles was small. Moreover, the coagulation ofRh was also small. However, catalyst activity was low. This isconsidered to be because, though the diameter of the Pt particles issmall, the pore volumes are small, the exhaust gas is difficult to passthrough the pores, and the exhaust gas is less likely to reach Pt.

As opposed to this, in each of the catalysts in Example 11 to Example14, the diameter of the Pt particles after the durability wasapproximately 10 nm, and the coagulation of the Pt particles was small.Moreover, the particle diameter of the Rh particles was approximately 6nm, and the coagulation thereof was small. Furthermore, in each ofExample 15 and Example 16, the diameter of the Pd particles wasapproximately 6 nm, and the coagulation of the Pd particles was small.Also with regard to the Rh particles, the diameter thereof wasapproximately 6 nm, and the coagulation thereof was also small. From theabove, the catalyst activity of each of these Examples 11 to 16 wasextremely good in comparison with those of Comparative examples 3 to 6,and high activity was able to be obtained.

Table 4 shows evaluation results and the pore volumes of the catalystlayers in the respective catalysts of Example 17 to Example 19 andComparative examples 7 and 8. Moreover, FIG. 6 shows HC T50temperatures, at which the HC(C₃H₆) purification rates became 50%, forExample 17 to Example 19 and Comparative examples 7 and 8.

TABLE 4 FIRST LAYER SECOND LAYER FIRST FIRST PRE- COMPOUND/ PORE PRE-COMPOUND/ CIOUS PORE VOLUME SECOND VOLUME CIOUS PORE VOLUME METAL(cm³/g) COMPOUND (cm³/g) METAL (cm³/g) EXAMPLE 17 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.43 RhZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 0.18 OXIDE 0.28 EXAMPLE 18 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃0.47 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 0.28 OXIDE 0.30 EXAMPLE 19 PtCeZr Al₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 0.30 OXIDE 0.32COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.20 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 7 COMPOSITE COMPOSITEOXIDE 0.15 OXIDE 0.16 COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.23 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 8COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 0.40 OXIDE 0.41 SECOND LAYER NOx50% HC 50% CO50% PORE PURIFICATION PURIFICATION PURIFICATION SECOND VOLUMETEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE COMPOUND (cm³/g) (° C.) (° C.) (°C.) EXAMPLE 17 Al₂O₃ 0.45 321 316 314 EXAMPLE 18 Al₂O₃ 0.47 320 314 311EXAMPLE 19 Al₂O₃ 0.51 318 312 309 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.21 328 326 323EXAMPLE 7 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 327 323 321 EXAMPLE 8

Comparative example 7 is one using one, in which the pore volume of thecerium-zirconium composite oxide is 0.15 cm³/g, and the volume of thezirconium-lanthanum composite oxide is 0.16 cm³/g, and catalyst activitythereof was low. Catalyst activity was similarly low also in Comparativeexample 8. This is considered to be because, since the pore volumes ofthe cerium-zirconium composite oxide and the zirconium-lanthanumcomposite oxide are small, the pore volumes of the catalyst layers alsobecame small. As opposed to this, in each of the catalysts in Example 17to Example 19, the diameter of the Pt particles after the durability wasapproximately 10 nm, and the coagulation of the Pt particles was small.Moreover, the particle diameter of the Rh particles was approximately 6nm, and the coagulation thereof was also small. From the above, thecatalyst activity of each of these Examples 17 to 19 was extremely goodin comparison with those of Comparative examples 7 and 8, and highactivity is able to be obtained.

Table 5 shows evaluation results and the pore volumes of the catalystlayers in the respective catalysts of Example 20 to Example 22 andComparative examples 9 and 10. Moreover, FIG. 7 shows HC T50temperatures, at which the HC(C₃H₆) purification rates became 50%, forExample 20 to Example 22 and Comparative examples 9 and 10.

TABLE 5 FIRST LAYER SECOND LAYER FIRST FIRST PRE- COMPOUND/ PORE PRE-COMPOUND/ CIOUS CeO₂:ZrO₂ SECOND VOLUME CIOUS ZrO₂:La₂O₂ METAL (%)COMPOUND (cm³/g) METAL (%) EXAMPLE 20 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLaCOMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 74:26 OXIDE 95:5 EXAMPLE 21 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.50Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 78:22 OXIDE 97:3 EXAMPLE 22 Pt CeZrAl₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 80:10 OXIDE 99:1COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.23 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 9 COMPOSITE COMPOSITEOXIDE 70:30 OXIDE 90:10 COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.22 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE10 COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE 90:10 OXIDE 100:0 SECOND LAYER NOx50% HC50% CO 50% PORE PURIFICATION PURIFICATION PURIFICATION SECOND VOLUMETEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE COMPOUND (cm³/g) (° C.) (° C.) (°C.) EXAMPLE 20 Al₂O₃ 0.51 321 314 309 EXAMPLE 21 Al₂O₃ 0.52 319 313 307EXAMPLE 22 Al₂O₃ 0.51 321 315 309 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 329 326 322EXAMPLE 9 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 329 327 323 EXAMPLE 10

In Comparative example 9 and Comparative example 10, as the firstcompounds 5, those were used, in which composite ratios of the ceriumoxide, the zirconium oxide and the like were changed. In Comparativeexample 9, the composite ratios of the cerium oxide and the zirconiumoxide in the first layer are 70% and 30%, the composite ratios of thezirconium oxide and the lanthanum oxide in the second layer are 90% and10%, and catalyst activity thereof is low in comparison with those ofExamples 20 to 22. In accordance with the observation using the TEM, thediameter of the Pt particles in the first layer was approximately 10 nm.The diameter of the Rh particles in the second layer was as small asapproximately 6 nm; however, a state was observed, in which the Rhparticles were buried in aggregates of the zirconium-lanthanum compositeoxide particles. Moreover, in Comparative example 10, the compositeratios of the cerium oxide and the zirconium oxide in the first layerare 90% and 10%, the zirconium oxide occupied 100% in the second layer,and catalyst activity thereof is low in comparison with those ofExamples 20 to 22.

In accordance with the observation using the TEM, the diameter of the Ptparticles in the first layer was approximately 10 nm. Although thediameter of the Rh particles in the second layer was as small asapproximately 6 nm, the state was observed, in which the Rh particleswere buried in the aggregates of the zirconium oxide particles. It isconsidered that this is caused by the fact that the composite oxide ofthe cerium oxide and the zirconium oxide is inferior in oxygen evolutioncapability, as well as that the pore volumes of the catalysts ofComparative examples 9 and 10 are small. Moreover, it is considered thatthis is caused by the fact that, owing to the composite ratios of thezirconium oxide and the lanthanum oxide, the zirconium-lanthanumcomposite oxide particles become likely to be coagulated, and the Rhparticles are buried in the zirconium-lanthanum composite oxideparticles and the zirconium oxide particles, and become difficult tocontact the exhaust gas.

Table 6 shows evaluation results and the pore volumes of the catalystlayers in the respective catalysts of Example 23 to Example 25 andComparative examples 11 and 12. Moreover, FIG. 8 shows HC T50temperatures, at which the HC(C₃H₆) purification rates became 50%, forExample 23 to Example 25 and Comparative examples 11 and 12.

TABLE 6 FIRST LAYER SECOND LAYER PRE- SECOND PORE PRE- CIOUS FIRSTCOMPOUND/ VOLUME CIOUS FIRST METAL COMPOUND CeO₂:ZrO₂ (cm³/g) METALCOMPOUND EXAMPLE 23 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 5:7 0.27 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITEOXIDE OXIDE EXAMPLE 24 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 10:5 0.31 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITECOMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE EXAMPLE 25 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 15:3 0.28 Rh ZrLaCOMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE COMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 2:1 0.22 RhZrLa EXAMPLE 11 COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDE COMPARATIVE Pt CeZrAl₂O₃ 20:10 0.23 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 12 COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDESECOND LAYER NOx50% HC 50% CO 50% PORE PURIFICATION PURIFICATIONPURIFICATION SECOND VOLUME TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE COMPOUND(cm³/g) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) EXAMPLE 23 Al₂O₃ 0.26 322 316 316 EXAMPLE24 Al₂O₃ 0.26 320 315 313 EXAMPLE 25 Al₂O₃ 0.26 321 316 315 COMPARATIVEAl₂O₃ 0.22 328 326 322 EXAMPLE 11 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 328 326 322EXAMPLE 12

In Comparative examples 11 and 12, catalyst activities thereof are lowin comparison with those of Examples 23 to 25. In Examples 23 to 25, thecerium compound and the zirconium compound are added to such an aluminaprecursor, whereby heat resistance of the alumina after being calcinedis enhanced, and the pore volumes after the durability are maintainedlargely. However, in Comparative examples 11 and 12, there is no effectof adding the cerium compound and the zirconium compound, the porevolumes after the durability cannot be ensured, and the pore volumesbecome small, and therefore, it is considered that the exhaust gasbecomes less likely to reach the precious metals, leading to such adecrease of the catalyst activity.

Table 7 shows evaluation results and the pore volumes of the catalystlayers in the respective catalysts of Example 26 to Example 28 andComparative example 13. Moreover, FIG. 9 shows HC T50 temperatures, atwhich the HC(C₃H₆) purification rates became 50%, for Example 26 toExample 28 and Comparative examples 13.

TABLE 7 FIRST LAYER SECOND LAYER PRE- PORE PRE- CIOUS FIRST SECONDVOLUME CIOUS FIRST METAL COMPOUND COMPOUND (cm³/g) METAL COMPOUNDEXAMPLE 26 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 27 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDEEXAMPLE 28 Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.49 Rh ZrLa COMPOSITE COMPOSITE OXIDE OXIDECOMPARATIVE Pt CeZr Al₂O₃ 0.22 Rh ZrLa EXAMPLE 13 COMPOSITE COMPOSITEOXIDE OXIDE SECOND LAYER NOx50% HC 50% CO 50% PORE PURIFICATIONPURIFICATION PURIFICATION SECOND VOLUME TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURETEMPERATURE COMPOUND (cm³/g) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) EXAMPLE 26 Al₂O₃ 0.50324 318 315 EXAMPLE 27 Al₂O₃ 0.50 322 315 312 EXAMPLE 28 Al₂O₃ 0.50 320311 309 COMPARATIVE Al₂O₃ 0.22 330 328 325 EXAMPLE 13

In Comparative example 13, catalyst activity thereof is low incomparison with those of Examples 26 to 28. In Examples 26 to 28, thediameter of the Pt particles in the first layer was approximately 10 nmor less in accordance with the observation using the TEM. The diameterof the Rh particles in the second layer was as small as approximately 6nm or less. This is considered to be because the initial degrees ofdispersion of the precious metal particles were high and effects of theprecious metals lasted even after the durability. As opposed to this, inComparative example 13, the diameter of the Pt particles in the firstlayer was approximately 15 nm in accordance with the observation usingthe TEM. The diameter of the Rh particles in the second layer wasapproximately 10 nm, and the particle diameters became somewhat largerin comparison with those of Examples 26 to 28. This is considered to bebecause the initial degrees of dispersion of the precious metals werelow and the coagulation of the precious metal particles owing to thedurability became likely to progress.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The present invention can be applied to the exhaust gas purifyingcatalyst that purifies the exhaust gas discharged from a vehicle such asan automobile.

1. An exhaust gas purifying catalyst, comprising: a honeycomb carrier;and a catalyst layer provided on the honeycomb carrier, the catalystlayer comprising: precious metal particles; a plurality of firstcompounds on which the precious metal particles are supported; andsecond compounds which cover the plurality of first compounds on whichthe precious metal particles are supported and separate the firstcompounds from one another, wherein a pore volume of the catalyst layeris within a range of 0.24 to 0.8 cm³/g.
 2. The exhaust gas purifyingcatalyst according to claim 1, wherein the first compounds are an oxidecontaining Ce.
 3. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to claim1, wherein the first compounds contain CeO_(2.)
 4. The exhaust gaspurifying catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the first compoundscontain a composite oxide of Ce and Zr.
 5. The exhaust gas purifyingcatalyst according to claim 1, wherein the second compounds comprisesAl₂O₃.
 6. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to claim 1,wherein the second compounds are an oxide containing at least either ofAl and Zr.
 7. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to claim 1,wherein both of the first compounds and the second compounds are formedinto a particle shape, and an average particle diameter of the secondcompounds is 10 to 100 nm.
 8. The exhaust gas purifying catalystaccording to claim 1, wherein the precious metal particles comprises atleast one selected from the group consisting of Pt, Pd and Rh.
 9. Theexhaust gas purifying catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the porevolume of the first compounds is within a range of 0.18 to 0.38 cm³/g.10. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst according to claim 1, wherein thefirst compounds are composed of CeO₂ that occupies 74 to 80% and ZrO₂that occupies 20 to 26%.
 11. The exhaust gas purifying catalystaccording to claim 1, wherein the first compounds are composed of ZrO₂that occupies 95 to 99% and La₂O₃ that occupies 1 to 5%.
 12. The exhaustgas purifying catalyst according to claim 1, wherein a pore volume of aprecursor of the second compounds after being calcined is within a rangeof 0.8 to 1.0 cm³/g.
 13. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst according toclaim 5, wherein the alumina comprises CeO₂ that occupies 5 to 15% andZrO₂ that occupies 3 to 7%.
 14. The exhaust gas purifying catalystaccording to claim 1, wherein an aspect ratio of the precursor of thesecond compounds is within a range of 0.5 to
 10. 15. The exhaust gaspurifying catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the second compoundscomprise Al₂O₃ derived from boehmite of which an aspect ratio is withina range of 0.5 to
 10. 16. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst accordingto claim 1, wherein a degree of dispersion of the precious metalparticles in powder of the exhaust gas purifying catalyst is within arange of 35 to 80%.
 17. The exhaust gas purifying catalyst according toclaim 1, wherein a degree of dispersion of the precious metal particlessupported on the first compounds is within a range of 50 to 100%.